3/4" WOW! So I win right? :mrgreen:
Yup! PM was sent!
The decision to widen the chassis up came after a lot of testing and tuning. There were just some things on my truck that I could not work out and I finally figured out that it had to do with lower link triangulation.
There is a point when too much triangulation can be bad, but also too little can also be bad.
The amount of triangulation that I added was based on several trial and error tests. I wanted a truck that felt stable in the most extreme limits of suspension travel and I kept adding width until it felt right. Not only changing the width, but lowering the roll center of the chassis helped tremendously.
I consulted with Nabil the other night and he agreed that the changes would be a good start so I now felt confident that it should work well.
One other thing that we had talked about is that with everyone moving as much weight as possible out of their chassis, it was having an effect on geometry. The more weight in your chassis, the less effect link positioning has on antisquat and squat. With less weight, it takes less aggressive geometry changes. By lowering my upper link mounting positions, it allowed the roll center to change along with having more overall traction.
The truck truly drives like a whole different truck now. I just want to try playing a little with shock pistons and shock oil. I'm currently running my 4" big bores with 3 hole pistons with 22.5 wt oil. I want to try out 2 hole pistons with some lighter oil. Even though they will probably feel about the same, the two hole piston will allow the shock to have a more progressive feel when driving fast and making quick transitions.
I'm not sure if the XR guys are experiencing the same finding that I uncovered as the XR version of the chassis is a bit different. Since mine is a berg version, I'm sure its just a berg thing... LOL!!:mrgreen: