That goes for both Democrats AND Republicans. I sit back and listen to both sides with disgust because this is all I hear.all you get is cliches, pompous disregard, and insults.
That goes for both Democrats AND Republicans. I sit back and listen to both sides with disgust because this is all I hear.all you get is cliches, pompous disregard, and insults.
Well, I read through this conversation and I have a few things to say.Very typical of those on the pro-Obama/health reform band wagon. Facts mean nothing and when confronted with the truth, all you get is cliches, pompous disregard, and insults. Oh ya, and this is family:lmao:
Ahhh! The science behind politics!!! I see a lot of posts that show the divided mind set. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
<o></o>
No matter who is in Office, the other side will argue the plan or bill. Give all the reasons in the world it's in the end of <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comffice:smarttags" /><st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">America</st1lace></st1:country-region>. It's who ever is in office at the time fault... Weather or not a plan will actually help change the current problem, we (the people) will always be torn apart by the belief it will or won't work., driven by media. Most the people here are not in economics or politics. Whatever we heard on the radio or news is what we believe to be true. Where else do you get your political data? Either from one left wing source or the other right wing... they both make crap up. :twisted:
<o></o>
<o></o>
Unfortunately, the system is created to divide us. Left and Right, Conservative/Liberal... Based on your beliefs, you divide from those people that have different beliefs. Why? Because if their belief is right, then yours is not. SO fight till the end to prove yours is right and eliminate anyone that believes otherwise. SAD! This doesn't solve the problem, it keeps one side in control and the other bitching about it. Stonewalling bills and projects that could actually help us.
<o></o>
<o></o>
Bottom line, I’m not taking sides. It comes down to our current system and math. It IS failing. Social Security, Education, Health... If something isn't done now, we will not receive the SS money for retirement that they take from our checks. If we don't change health care, they Will spend over $2 trillion over 10 years caring for illegal’s. Under a new plan, $1.2 trillion over 10 years... Compared to $10 Trillion on HLS and War, What is the big deal?
<o></o>
<o></o>
Listen to what the opposition is saying... $1.2 Trillion of health care is the end of <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">America</st1lace></st1:country-region> over the next 10 years, but $10 Trillion spent on WAR and Killing people is no big deal? That's 10 times the amount they plan to spend on helping people and curing sickness, but it's ok because you’re "Safe from terrorist" now. :roll:
<o></o>
<o></o>
Again, I'm not taking sides or calling out anyone that obviously is too blinded by left/right to sit down and come up with solutions. It's easier to complain about the people trying to solve the problem then do something about it yourself.
<o></o>
<o></o>
Lastly, I thought Bush was the historically identified figure referred to as the “village idiot” but I still gave him the respect he deserved as the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">US</st1lace></st1:country-region> President. It’s ok to disagree with your president, but what does it do to OUR image as Americans or how does it help to blatantly disrespect our #1 representative? <o></o>
<o></o>
What does it do to OUR image as Americans when our #1 representative travels to other countries and disrespects us??but what does it do to OUR image as Americans or how does it help to blatantly disrespect our #1 representative? <o></o>
<o></o>
At my job I deal with quite a few MDs and none of them are considering retirement.
What does it do to OUR image as Americans when our #1 representative travels to other countries and disrespects us??
They DO listen.
Second, most people dont actually understand how medical insurance works. They dont know that the American Government is actually the entity that drives up the prices for EVERYONE. The hospitals/medical professionals and Medicare currently both do a dance to get what they want. Medicare only reimburses 1/3 of what is billed. To counteract that, hospitals and medical professionals bill 3 times what they wish to collect. Everyone is happy, right? Wrong. When a "for cash" patient comes along, Medicare REQUIRES that they are billed the same as a Medicare patient....even though Medicare only plans to pay out 1/3 of that amount.
Before the Senate voted on this bill, I wrote them both from my state...and both responded agreeing with my opinions. I am not just a Monday morning quarterback....I make my opinions know to my elected officials when I feel it is necessary.If you feel your being miss- represented, write your congress and senate.
Actually, they will sometimes pay more than Medicare, but in general they just follow suit. What Medicare pays is the standard. Much of the work that I do everyday is because a bureaucrat has decided what is best for our patients. They have lawmakers deciding the rules of this game....and that is wrong.You are correct but do not forget to include the health insurance companies in there as well. They operate much the same way.
I work with about 20 doctors on a daily basis (age ranging from about 35 to 65) and none of them are considering retirement anytime soon.Published in the NEJM, a survey of Physicians, concludes that nearly one third, would consider leaving the medical profession, or retiring early.
Living off of SS and what you have saved throughout your life IS a fixed income. The elderly are generally NOT able to earn a living like the rest of us, however, they do require more medical attention. I do not believe that it is right to take money from their programs and give it to those who ARE able to get jobs and work hard, yet chose not to...
At my job I deal with quite a few MDs and none of them are considering retirement.
No fantasy here...I knew that the response that I got was a common response that is sent out to many people. However, at the time, one of my Senators was in an election for Governor of our state. She knew that if she wanted (actually, she didn't win the bid) people to vote for her, then she'd better listen to them. The other guy....well, that's a different story.I think a lot of people are either living in fantasy, or perhaps they are just niave. The fact is, 99.9% of the letters you write to your Rep. or Congressman are never seen or read by them...
Very few, if any of these people, will listen to/do anything for any one person or group, that does not carry some financial or political benefit for them personally.
Before the Senate voted on this bill, I wrote them both from my state...and both responded agreeing with my opinions. I am not just a Monday morning quarterback....I make my opinions know to my elected officials when I feel it is necessary.
.
Well, IMO, there are better ways to go about helping those in need than the current proposed method. There is way too much "piggybacking" and hands in pockets with this bill.taking the life raft right now maybe the smartest thing we do, but we just can't see it yet...<o></o>
taking the life raft right now maybe the smartest thing we do, but we just can't see it yet...
Well, IMO, there are better ways to go about helping those in need than the current proposed method. There is way too much "piggybacking" and hands in pockets with this bill.
I dont understand why the government needs control of this industry. What they should do is simply help out those who need it.
For example, when a person fills out his W2 (that's right....those that have jobs get the help), he could select the "government option" for health insurance coverage. Now, if you know anything about negotiating health insurance contracts, you'd be very familiar with the fact that an employer of a large company is going to get a better deal per person from these insurance providers than an employer of a small company. Now, what kind of deal could the government (or an affiliate) negotiate if they brought 1 million customers to the table? I'd guess, a helluva deal. After the deal is made, the individual would be responsible for the cost (much lower than if the individual negotiated the contract himself.....which is the major complaint of most uninsured). All of this happens at NO extra cost to the taxpayers.
Now, if I can see a solution as simple as this, then why cant a professional politician?!?!
To where?
From my side it's Neither...The answer can only be Both, depending on which side of the Arc you are standing...
From my side it's Neither...
BTW, I know that my solution would come with complexities and people complaining...."who would get the contract??"...."how well did my negotiator do his job this year??"....plenty of uncertainties, however, one major positive is that mine is not a "Robin Hood Plan" like the current "solution". I don't think that one group of people should pay for the insurance of another.