Mr.Slave
Quarry Creeper
so whats everyones thoughts on this individual having the right to own weapons?
Now take this here.
If a media outlet such as cnn reports this,and gives thier spin it deemd as truth.
Let fox reprort it and give thier spin,its bias:roll:
let bill meher talk about it and give his 2cents and its a talk show
let rush do it and its bias lies :ror:
I have seen it for yrs,the libs are just pissed that people like myslef are no longer FORCED to absorb thier B.S. rederic if we want to know whats going on in the world/country.Now there are many sources that have a political opinion/spin that I and many others AGREE with.
enjoy the spin on your news however you want it just know that you are therefore no better for having a different spin. know what i mean.
so whats everyones thoughts on this individual having the right to own weapons?
Its a right,right?
If he has no convictions,then by what RIGHT would we say he cant own one?
so whats everyones thoughts on this individual having the right to own weapons?
because he's a looney that should be sharing a room with harry the shit eater?
surely you are joking?
He was in prison, his record was wiped clean which allowed him to pass a background check, he was kicked out of the military and collage because he was not mentally fit. Medical records should be included in background checks, this shooting and the shooting at Virgina tech could have been prevented.
I was unawar of this
But what happens when people are affraid they will lose thier rights for seeing the dr?
Some people will choose not to seek that help,so making med.records
part of a check,may end up having a negative effect.
I dont know why a criminal record would be wiped clean,if it was a felony it should have stuck.
If someone is seen as mentally unfit thay should not be able to purchase a firearm unless they are cleared, it wouldnt be like a felony if you got one it can never be taken off type of deal.
By what i was told he had a ton of traffic violations and was in possession of drugs in and out of the military.
My understanding is felonies stick,and if its not a felony,my understanding is he would still be able to own a firarm.He might have committed those crimes as a Juvenal, do those still stick after a certain age?
so whats everyones thoughts on this individual having the right to own weapons?
This individual was well known to Sheriff Clarence Dupnick, he had numerous calls from local talk radio stations and the college Jared attended, among others, about death threats they had recieved via telephone calls from Jared, they asked (pleaded) for some type of pre-emtive action against this maniac, from law enforcement, but were told not to worry as he was being well cared for by the local mental health system. Nothing was done, and six people were murdered and many injured on this Sheriff's watch, he is a card carrying liberal democrat, and tried to put a spin on the story at a news conference on Satuday evening by blaming conservative talk radio and conservative politicians.
So you're going to blame it all on Reagan, really? :roll:
Now take this here.
If a media outlet such as cnn reports this,and gives thier spin it deemd as truth.
Let fox reprort it and give thier spin,its bias:roll:
let bill meher talk about it and give his 2cents and its a talk show
let rush do it and its bias lies :ror:
I have seen it for yrs,the libs are just pissed that people like myslef are no longer FORCED to absorb thier B.S. rederic if we want to know whats going on in the world/country.Now there are many sources that have a political opinion/spin that I and many others AGREE with.
Spin is just the way a certain individual or group percieves something.
You have youer view,and if you tell anyone what that view is.......
well you just put your spin on it.
The difference is there is news, there is opinion, and there is talk. The news is fact, the opinion is a perception of fact, and talk is discussion of both fact and perception.
IMO-opinion is simply talk"thumbsup"
FOX news does in fact report the news,its commentators give thier perspective (opinion,view) on that news,and there are at times guests
who will also give thier opinion.
So fox covers all the bases"thumbsup"
Applied to the current topic, the fact is that a mentally deranged person killed and wounded people, some civilians, some government officials, at a Democratic biased event. The opinion is that it was spurred on by extreme right wing hate speech. The talk is what we and many other groups of people around the country are doing right now. Opinion and talk have no effect on fact.
That is the opinion of the libs
The opinion and talk DO have an effect on the fact,if not then there would be no reason not to allow jurrers to watch the news about thier cases.
See the jurnalist instictivley slant a story accourding to thier opinion/persective.This slant,becomes part of the fact,people watch,and absorb that fact,slant included.A jurnalsit may listen to talk,that then affects the way they percieve the fact aswell.Then they report thier new slant on the fact.
CNN is a news outlet. Biased or not, they report news. Fox is also a news outlet, but have many opinionated talk shows which report "news" and their opinion of it. Bill Maher does not have a news show. He has a comedic talk show and discusses current events with a panel that may or may not agree with him.
Ha! Problem is that Billy boy is about as much news as the typical
liberal student watches.And I actually know a very socialist family,and he is thier faborite COMMENTATOR of the NEWS:roll:
Also, find some CNN reporters or anchors or talk show hosts that contradict themselves or backpedal as much as what you will find on Fox. That is why they have little credibility outside their core fanbase.
you must have a blind eye for the libs,cuz they back pedal constantly,a hell of alot more than fox:ror:
Nobody forces you to "absorb" bullshit rhetoric. Getting your info from one outlet is ignorant at best, no matter whether you agree with what you're getting or not.
When I was younger,fox was not there,I would get my news from the available sources (LIBERAL MEDIA) and as I mentioned above,they would instictlivly add thier slant/perspective.
Now in the last few decades,we are getting some options,and finally I can
get news with a slant that happens to slant the same as me;-)
That is true, but there are people who get paid to "spin" a topic to be in favor of a certain person or parties views, basically spinning or twisting the truth or fact. Ever hear of a spin doctor?
"I tell people don't kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus -- living fossils -- so we will never forget what these people stood for." -- Rush Limbaugh
My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." -- Ann Coulter
"We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed too." -- Ann Coulter
"And if Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead." -- Bill O'Reilly
"I tell people don't kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus -- living fossils -- so we will never forget what these people stood for." -- Rush Limbaugh
My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." -- Ann Coulter
"We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed too." -- Ann Coulter
"And if Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead." -- Bill O'Reilly