JeremyH
I wanna be Dave
Agreed! I am tired of this current system. An "across the board" percentage would be a much better system!
-
Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.
It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!
Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.
Bush Resigns!
- Thread starter jason
- Start date
ZIP
Rock Stacker
Everybody should just watch this and see if you really think that Americans have any brains at all... This would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
These are all people that voted for Hussein and they aren't ALL hippies..some are and they ought to go home and take a shower.:roll:
http://howobamagotelected.com/
These are all people that voted for Hussein and they aren't ALL hippies..some are and they ought to go home and take a shower.:roll:
http://howobamagotelected.com/
coolkidjf7
Quarry Creeper
Allright, lets see 12 "informed" mccain voters answer those questions. Wow I could pick stupid people and ask them questions too.:roll:
Okay, lets see what people remember, people who are in congress or scandals... wow incredibly biased
Okay, lets see what people remember, people who are in congress or scandals... wow incredibly biased
The people in the questions were actually picked by a black female Obama supporter.
Zogby performed a pole for them with the same results as well.
Anyone who thinks McCain was Bush needs to do research, especially looking to the 2000 primaries.
Obama was elected because he talks pretty and says change a lot, McCain was skipped over because he was not exciting to listen too and is old.
Most people are sheep, to stupid to think for themselves and always dependent on someone else to make their choices for them.
BTW binaryterror, the reference you made to separation of church and state is nowhere in the constitution and you need to read the whole writing by Thomas Jefferson to understand what he was talking about. The fact is that the majority of the framers of the Constitution were Free Masons, who indeed are Christians which is one of the primary requirements of being a Free Mason. Before someone starts bashing Free Masons though, do research first and it actually helps to know Free Masons.
Zogby performed a pole for them with the same results as well.
Anyone who thinks McCain was Bush needs to do research, especially looking to the 2000 primaries.
Obama was elected because he talks pretty and says change a lot, McCain was skipped over because he was not exciting to listen too and is old.
Most people are sheep, to stupid to think for themselves and always dependent on someone else to make their choices for them.
BTW binaryterror, the reference you made to separation of church and state is nowhere in the constitution and you need to read the whole writing by Thomas Jefferson to understand what he was talking about. The fact is that the majority of the framers of the Constitution were Free Masons, who indeed are Christians which is one of the primary requirements of being a Free Mason. Before someone starts bashing Free Masons though, do research first and it actually helps to know Free Masons.
ZIP
Rock Stacker
Did you bother reading the accompanying article? Did you even listen to their answers? They actually blamed things on McCain the were done by Obama. They all said it was Palin that said she coud see Russia from her house when actually it was that hairbrained twit Tiny Fey on Saturday NIght Live. I have to believe McCain lost because most of the people in the country were too stupid to understand what they should have known about Hussien and his socialist plans and just slobbered all over the media coverage of his campaign like he was some kind of god. GHAD!!! He's just a scumbag two-bit politician from the south side of Chicago.
Hey you Obamanitwits I'll keep my guns, money and freedom and you can keep the "change"... all 15 cents of it.
dezfan
I wanna be Dave
Did you bother reading the accompanying article? Did you even listen to their answers? They actually blamed things on McCain the were done by Obama. They all said it was Palin that said she coud see Russia from her house when actually it was that hairbrained twit Tiny Fey on Saturday NIght Live. I have to believe McCain lost because most of the people in the country were too stupid to understand what they should have known about Hussien and his socialist plans and just slobbered all over the media coverage of his campaign like he was some kind of god. GHAD!!! He's just a scumbag two-bit politician from the south side of Chicago.
Hey you Obamanitwits I'll keep my guns, money and freedom and you can keep the "change"... all 15 cents of it.
Don't be to hard of coolkid. He is just that, a kid. I thought I knew everything when I was his age too.:ror:
Give him a few years under the Obama regime and some time to form his own opinion."thumbsup"
binaryterror
I wanna be Dave
I hear Palin didn't realize Africa was a continent either. She also couldn't name the members involved with NAFTA. I believe some might call her a McCain supporter.
You'll always find idiots be they democrats, republicans, 3rd parties or independents.
I said it is the first amendment, which is in the constitution as the Bill Of Rights (Amendments 1-10) and has been since the ratification of the First Amendment in 1791.
Since you can't do a google search yourself to see what the true text of the First Amendment of our great Constitution, here is the exact wording of the First amendment as per the www.usconstitution.net's copy:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Sorry to burst your bubble, Mr Jefferson can not truely be classified as any religion. Many consider him Unitarian, Deist, or Christian; unfortunately all are wrong. Seems Mr. Jefferson believed in little pieces of each which sculpted his views once he was old enough to think and be of his own mind. He however has never been tied to Free Masonry.
As I delve deeper it seems this topic isn't as cut and dry on exactly who could be called out as Deist. One quote or story points to Deism, another to Unitarianism, and some even very Christian in nature. One must also remember in those times it was typical to be brought up as your family in their church so many specific quotes and texts seem to be questionable.
Though you must be warned Deists still believe in a God and afterlife, however their major difference is that they feel God does not favor any one/group/nation of another nor does God interfere in humanity. That last 2 pieces are what truely seperates Deism from the Monotheism of Christianity and many other religious beliefs.
Freemasonry is a fraternity, and as you mention does have requirements (I am part of a Fraternity, Lamda Chi Alpha). However there is no requirement to be a Christian and only a Christian; you must just believe in a Supreme Being. Freemasonry openly states that is it not a religion or a substitute for one. Freemasonry does allow non-Christian people who believe in a Supreme Being such as Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, and even Sikhism. The only thing that could keep out other religions is in the secret voting in process which they could black ball someone over religion (much like a college fraternity black balling a short person or fat person should they so see fit)...but again the term per Freemasonry is Supreme Being not Christianity.
The only known group of Freemasonry that requires Christian only membership in its doctrine is that of the Swedish Rite in Sweden.
Last edited:
T.R.C
Newbie
I thought what Howerd Stern did was kind of funny, Although they did only interview a couple people, its scary how people just go along with what is "popular" without knowing any facts.
35% for a couple F-bombs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5p3OB6roAg
35% for a couple F-bombs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5p3OB6roAg
dezfan
I wanna be Dave
:ror:
I've heard that a few times.
Sad, that so many voted for him because of his color and not his qualifications.
He received 95% of the black vote, much of it based on color I dare say:-(.
Cloak
I wanna be Dave
I remember reading those stats. Similar results among 18-29, less than $100k income (more highly skewed as you go down in income) and other minority groups. Hispanic included.
Hell, NM voted blue for the first time in a long time. I guess all those damn northerns and Santa Feans are finally having their effect.
T.R.C
Newbie
Yep its sad, most of the poeple I talk to about who were voting for said Obama, when I asked why they always replied, "well he's for change, at thats what we need..." i couldnt hardly get a decent response out of most of them. it seams like most just fallow the media and whats popular, and with the media constantly attacking McCain and bush, and making Obama out to be the golden boy, i see why McCain lost. It worrys m that people are unknowingly turning our country into a socialist country.
tanner
Rock Crawler
thought these were funny
coolkidjf7
Quarry Creeper
Did you bother reading the accompanying article? Did you even listen to their answers? They actually blamed things on McCain the were done by Obama. They all said it was Palin that said she coud see Russia from her house when actually it was that hairbrained twit Tiny Fey on Saturday NIght Live. I have to believe McCain lost because most of the people in the country were too stupid to understand what they should have known about Hussien and his socialist plans and just slobbered all over the media coverage of his campaign like he was some kind of god. GHAD!!! He's just a scumbag two-bit politician from the south side of Chicago.
Hey you Obamanitwits I'll keep my guns, money and freedom and you can keep the "change"... all 15 cents of it.
I did both of those things, it seems that people who form opinions based on SNL are grouped in with people who actually appreciate the things that Mr. Obama has to offer. I don't care how "socialist" this "Hussain" guy seems to you guys, healthcare, social security, and Iraq all need reforming. It simply seemed to me that Mccain wasn't willing to change things that, under Bush, were not working.
The Real Dogman
RCC Addict
Would someone please tell who this Obama cat is??? Can I vote for him now??
binaryterror
I wanna be Dave
LMAO "thumbsup"
ZIP
Rock Stacker
Well MR COOLKID can you or any other Hussein lover point out one good thing that he ever did that benefitted America or real Americans??? He has done nothing good in his life. He was a member of the senate for all of what 152(?) days and he introduced one bill that gave some African tribe couple of million dollars??? "Let's spread the wealth around": ...sounds like Karl Marx. He going to be taking from ME and giving it to welfare slackers and illegal immigrants...through social reforms....again sounds like Karl Marx. Why not make the scumbags in this country work for their money and all the illegals LEAVE!? HAH! That would be too easy.
coolkidjf7
Quarry Creeper
No need to personally insult me, I called him Mr. Obama out of respect for his position. The simplistic view of "grab our guns and kick those illegals out" is outrageous. Not only would it be inhumane but totally impossible... Israel all over again, might wanna do some research on that to see what happens when you uproot thousands of people"thumbsup"
I totally understand what people are saying.... 152 days. If you don't trust that maybe you should trust his law degrees. He also did a lot more than just "act like karl marx". Try reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama#Legislation "thumbsup"
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bills_sponsored_by_Barack_Obama_in_the_United_States_Senate "thumbsup"
JeremyH
I wanna be Dave
Please explain how removing lawbreakers from this country would be "inhumane". People who break the law must be able to face the concequences. There is nothing inhumane about dealing out that concequence.
BTW, you guys really need to get a more reliable source than Wikipedia....remember, it is the "free encyclopedia that anyone can edit"
coolkidjf7
Quarry Creeper
Articles that describe things of high importance (such as president elects) are protected, edits must be reviewed before they are put into effect. Before you criticize, it might help to understand "thumbsup".
As for the "law breakers"... few questions for you; have you ever stolen anything (no matter how small)? Have you ever sped? Do you enjoy cheap prices on products such as fruit? Do you think it's inhumane to kick hardworking people and their families out of their home?
Grow a heart;-)
JeremyH
I wanna be Dave
Use your brain.
One day, when you actually begin to earn your own money, you will realize that the people who you are currently defending, are here utilizing the resources of this country, without paying the taxes that everyone else here has to pay. They came to this country illegally to avoid paying those taxes and to take the jobs of the people in this country. They are costing your parents money.
I realize that there are cheap products being created by these illegal immigrants and I do my best to avoid them. My wife and I buy as much stuff as we can from local suppliers (including farmers markets and small businesses). Just last weekend I spent a good chunk of money at a local furniture store that is owned and run by a family that is here legally from Mexico. You should really talk to legal immigrants....a good majority of them are NOT happy with the illegal immigrants (and rightly so). I have quite a few friends that have legally come to this country from all over the world (Poland, Romania, Mexico, Ukraine, Germany), and they are not happy with those who intentionally break the immigration laws of this country.
BTW, I do understand how wikipedia works. I have read many articles on that website, but I also understand that it is the internet....not everything that is found there is true. Books and magazines are slightly more reliable.
You have many life lessons to learn and not all of them are described on Wikipedia...
Last edited:
