• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

HB Rover Review

I think the Rovers are the new Claws. They seem to be gaining popularity like the Claws did over a year ago. Similar tread, similar grip... but bigger size and softer compound.

Aside from foam set up issues, they are my favorite since the Claws. "thumbsup"
 
These are on sale right now at tcscrawlers.com for 14.99 a pair.
I am wondering, has anyone been able to compare these to the HPI Rock Grabbers?
 
These are on sale right now at tcscrawlers.com for 14.99 a pair.
I am wondering, has anyone been able to compare these to the HPI Rock Grabbers?

seems like there are people who like one or the other better. The compound on the HPI's is the same as the medium rovers (HPI owns HB), so the soft rovers should be stickier. I have both soft rovers and the HPI's and actually like the HPI better. The rovers are TOO soft and ball up easily. I managed to get them to work by stuffing them full of foam, but they still ball up a bit. the HPI tires have more internal ribbing and just work better for me. But i still feel that on some rigs that may not hold true.
 
I think most of the guys that are having issues with the rovers not having enough support are running heavy rigs. Like over 7 lbs. Light rigs work well with the stock foam.
 
I think most of the guys that are having issues with the rovers not having enough support are running heavy rigs. Like over 7 lbs. Light rigs work well with the stock foam.

Foam selection is really important with the HBs. I've been screwing it up for 2 months now. Too hard, too soft... and making truck changes at the same time as foam changes...

I agree the stock foam is perfect on a light rig. Too stiff and they don't grab well. I don't think memory foam is the best choice for these either, and if you stuff them too full, the tire gets really tall and skinny.

Try Axial standard foam with about 1/4 inch strip around the outside. Stiffer than HB stock and still grippy. "thumbsup"
 
I think most of the guys that are having issues with the rovers not having enough support are running heavy rigs. Like over 7 lbs. Light rigs work well with the stock foam.

actually my rig is well under 7lbs. I tried everything from TCS reach foams, to stock foams, to stock HPI foams, to stock Axial foams. The only ones i could get to perform were stock HB foams with a 1/2 thickness strip of TCS all weathers on top of that.
 
I am running whites all around stock foams n DNA assassins, with 8 ozs up front and 3 in the rear. I noticed when I stuck the stick on weights inside my rims in pushed the foams out upfront getting rid of most the air gap. Not sure if its a good thing or bad. Well I will see this weekend. Any thoughts ? thanks
 
front Full stock foams with a 1/2" of another stock HB foam for added support

rear star-cut moab regular foam (close to panther regular foam)


^ on my rig. Last weekend I was with a berg driver who ran all stock, and liked it. It all depends on the driver.

Too hard of a foam in the back will make the tires not grip as stated above.
 
Last edited:
I pulled a set out of my chisels to try in my rovers...I like them. The standard ones not the two stage....I think those will be worth trying. My chisels are more important though, gotta try those first! ;-)
 
ya im still waiting for some chisles to come in at my lhs im fine with my foam setup right now, but the foams that come in the chisels seem like a really good option for these tires
 
front Full stock foams with a 1/2" of another stock HB foam for added support

rear star-cut moab regular foam (close to panther regular foam)


^ on my rig. Last weekend I was with a berg driver who ran all stock, and liked it. It all depends on the driver.

Too hard of a foam in the back will make the tires not grip as stated above.
The front stock foams. are those the mems that come with it? I just ordered a set of 4 for my truck and am lookin to see what is the best/cheapest way to get these meats dialed in.
 
Foam selection is really important with the HBs. I've been screwing it up for 2 months now. Too hard, too soft... and making truck changes at the same time as foam changes...

I agree the stock foam is perfect on a light rig. Too stiff and they don't grab well. I don't think memory foam is the best choice for these either, and if you stuff them too full, the tire gets really tall and skinny.

Try Axial standard foam with about 1/4 inch strip around the outside. Stiffer than HB stock and still grippy. "thumbsup"



:roll::roll::roll: I can't teach you anything :lol::lol:
 
In whites up front I have HB outers with 1/10th scale buggy foam inerds. In the rear its stock Losi foam from the claws. Works quite well."thumbsup"
 
the foams i run is northwester hybrid 5 in the front and stock in the rear. and the hook up well.
 
Just wondering if anyone is getting better traction with the front tires "backwards"? It seems to me that running the fronts backwards on my rig helps the front end bite down more. I have tried the same little hill in the same conditions with different tires and different configurations and the Rovers backwards on the front works the best by far.

Just curious if anyone else is getting that result.
 
no, regular soft foams come with them
I ordered the set off tcs and I thought the page said they're memory foam. Oh well I guess Ill see them when they get here:roll:. If they are the softs I read they are too short for the tire. would it be a good choice to shave like 1/2in. off the outside of the mems I got with my hammers and glue them to the outside of the stock rover foams to fill that gap:?: I really like the way the memory foams perform compared to regular foams.
 
Back
Top