Fishmaxx
I wanna be Dave
The only experience I have is with Crayons
I thought of you as a Side Walk Chalk Rembrandt 8)
The only experience I have is with Crayons
Fish, maybe your not understanding the format. There is no way for your scenario to work, if a driver dnf's the course he gets his normal progression points. They have to finish the course to get bonus points. It sounds like the way John ran it doesn't conform to the USRCCA rules and that's why Parker changed it to work with the USRCCA rules.
Fish, maybe your not understanding the format. There is no way for your scenario to work, if a driver dnf's the course he gets his normal progression points. They have to finish the course to get bonus points. It sounds like the way John ran it doesn't conform to the USRCCA rules and that's why Parker changed it to work with the USRCCA rules.
Looks like I might have spoke too soon :shock:
I think it "would" have been 100% enjoyable for those who paid airfair and transportation for a comp that was originally going to offer 3 classes.
Now it's 33.333% enjoyable since they spent all this money to find out what the signed up for isn't what they signed up for.
If the format had never changed it is what it is, but to change the format a month before the comp after people have made arrangements doesn't to fair to me.
You guys just added a pro drover to the axial team whom has extensive 1.9 wins listed on there drover profile, yet they can't even use them as this event.
Another course format that the drivers at the West Coast Qualifier drove with lip splitting smiles was the Lap Course. The course format was inspired by the game changing race known as the King of the Hammers or as the cool kids refer to it, KOH. The lay out is easy, 10 gates, 4 minutes, and 2 laps. The gates 1 thru 9 are technical and from gates 9 to 10 is a high speed boundary area. The boundary keeps the spectators from being run over and also keeps the drivers in a mode of controlled chaos. When a driver crosses gate 10 on his/her first lap, their points reset for the second lap, but the timer keeps ticking. This format is simple, it’s two courses that a driver runs back to back and receives scores for both laps. A drivers score could read like C-1; neg 10 / pos 2, or C-1; neg 10 / pos 32, or if the driver points out or times out on lap one, his/her score could look like this; C-1; pos 22 / pos 40.
Fish, maybe your not understanding the format. There is no way for your scenario to work, if a driver dnf's the course he gets his normal progression points. They have to finish the course to get bonus points. It sounds like the way John ran it doesn't conform to the USRCCA rules and that's why Parker changed it to work with the USRCCA rules.
I have read this KOH format 5 times now, and I still don't fully understand it, and it dosn't seem to comply with the USRCCA Rules. (If not it needs to be approved by RC) Somebody please explain it to me.
So you run the same course twice on one clock?
yes same course 2 laps under the same time it never stops.
So basically the highlighted parts of 1.4 , all of 1.11, and the safety measures built in to the rules are ignored.
1.4 - Vehicle Touch: (10 pts) All vehicle touches excluding “Rollovers” (See Rollover rule, sec 1.3), intentional or unintentional, are given an automatic 10 points. The judge then will stop time when either the driver calls for a vehicle touch or the judge calls a driver touch. The vehicle is then moved back by the driver to the previously cleared gate with the rear axle aligned to that gate. If the vehicle cannot be aligned to the gate due to course design, the judge will reposition the vehicle to the next stable location after the cleared gate. This location will be used for all drivers. Note: All gates for progress are still “live” unless a gate has already been deemed “dead”.
1.11 Time Out: A driver may call for time to stop so that he or she may safely reposition themselves on the course. This time shall be used for the purpose of driver safety and may not be used to survey the course or for any other advantage. Once the competitor is repositioned the time will start, however the judge has the right to start time at any point.
Sounds like to me this should have been brought to Rules Committee.
It is apparent that I exercised my option not to include the 1.9 or super class for the 2011 Axial West Coast Championships.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
<o></o>
<o></o>
Well Said! I tool time off back in Jan my self.. But no Big I'll deal.. It was going to cut into my Vac with my little girl anyways.I can't see how more then a handful of national ranked drivers can't setup and run a legit 1.9 and super courses for the weekend. If they can manage to win events, I'm sure they can produce epic organizational skills to make the weekend even better. We have over a month to get everyone invovled and make it happen I'm sure we can put our crayons together and DO WORK as you call it. Seems like not much work has been created by simply dropping classes last minute after some have already spent hard earned money for an event that isn't what they initially signed up for. It was going to be an epic and unforgettable event for 2011 west coast but now its just another 2.2 event that will only be remembered because it was that event that dropped classes after the fact. I thought CKRC was the only company here who advertised things that aren't what they are.
I put in vacation time for this event the day after new years, now i'm questioning the decision. Just because some aren't running the classes, doesn't mean they don't enjoy watching it. Why can't we make it happen and turn this thing around?