• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Cantilever Suspension

I concur with Crawlinwithacat, great advice! Cantilevers are more sensitive to small changes too. :) 8)
 
Thanks everyone.

More options for tuning and adjustment was about what I thought. Hopefully I can get a chance to switch them over and do some testing over xmas, then I'll report back "thumbsup"
 
I figured I'd bump this thread rather than making a new one. I'm in the planning stages of a 1.9 build and I think a canitlever rear suspension would work awesome for my application, which is a fairly lightweight scaler build. Likely around 5lbs once complete.



60-70mm shocks would likely be best. That has me looking at the Losi Mini T shocks and the Revo stuff.



I don't know much about either shock but I do know that spring kits exist for the Mini T so there would be a decent chance of getting the spring rate dialed in. Rocker geometry and preload are also variables I have to work with, I just want to make sure I don't miss the mark off the bat.



What's the go-to canti shock? Will the Losi's be too soft?



c68f44426b19ab7c7dd92149e4898ad6.jpg


0bcb6abac8fe97ac22aefce6a63072e7.jpg
 
Last edited:
I figured I'd bump this thread rather than making a new one. I'm in the planning stages of a 1.9 build and I think a canitlever rear suspension would work awesome for my application, which is a fairly lightweight scaler build. Likely around 5lbs once complete.



60-70mm shocks would likely be best. That has me looking at the Losi Mini T shocks and the Revo stuff.



I don't know much about either shock but I do know that spring kits exist for the Mini T so there would be a decent chance of getting the spring rate dialed in. Rocker geometry and preload are also variables I have to work with, I just want to make sure I don't miss the mark off the bat.



What's the go-to canti shock? Will the Losi's be too soft?



c68f44426b19ab7c7dd92149e4898ad6.jpg


0bcb6abac8fe97ac22aefce6a63072e7.jpg

Kind of off-topic, but @Bray D... I've always been curious how you get models of the chassis, tires, etc. into CAD to work with? I can't imagine that people are drawing everything up from scratch to mimic existing parts. I'm sure there's something people use to analyze an existing object to create a mesh body to import?
 
Kind of off-topic, but @Bray D... I've always been curious how you get models of the chassis, tires, etc. into CAD to work with? I can't imagine that people are drawing everything up from scratch to mimic existing parts. I'm sure there's something people use to analyze an existing object to create a mesh body to import?

There are a few file sharing sites online where people upload models. Some are classic reverse engineering work and I'm sure some are scanned mesh files. Accurate scanning equipment is extremely costly though, so most of this stuff is probably made sitting at a desk with said part and a pair of calipers, measuring and modeling as you go. It's fun. I've made my own wheels and stuff for my SCX24.

I pulled the servos, tires/wheels, axles, and trans from grabcad.com. Can't remember where I got my body model from, but I've had it for years and used it for building my 1:1. I stripped it down and scaled it for this 1.9 build.

Frame rails (measured and modeled from existing parts), crossmembers, brackets, and links are all me.
 
Hi Bray-D,
nice work on the 3d-modelling. I have used Vaterra canti-shocks from a Twinhammer. The HR / Dinky-RC seems a bit small for a SCX-10 based truck (in my opinion). I plan on using the Dinky-RC cantis on a Losi MRC based build.
Keep the canti-ratio in mind: a ratio 2:1 will require a 2x higher spring rate and damping ability as well as 1/2 of the desired travel. So using standard shocks in a canti setup will require more tuning.
Keep the good work going!
 
Thanks for the replies guys. I thought I’d try to use what I have so I started modeling around the 100mm shocks.

A frame extension off the back frees up the real estate, and I was able to stuff a 1:1 rocker in there so spring rate should be pretty similar to a traditional vertical shock setup.

I tied it all together with a massive crossmember to stiffen it up. Luckily all of this fits under my body too.

I’m currently 3D printing for a real world mock up. Full stuff > ride height > full droop

786a95b5c9978c4d0f2d328d68af6a41.jpg


263d0f70b52a1516491cfbba04250b7f.jpg


c04fb767853157eb7d22ed0b923e3db3.jpg


d65dcb885be57f6c4625be9a46250c8f.jpg
 
I thought through how I wanted to do the physical pivot and landed on a fixed pin that the rocker rotates on. I had some 1/4” round stock handy that I had already machined into long 3mm spacers. Perfect for a pivot pin.

That forced me to make my rocker pivot pretty big, but it feels robust. The 100mm shocks I had ‘on hand’ are actually coming in the AR45 axle kit and they’re not here yet. Here it is mocked up with an old Stampede shock body. It’s pretty close.

Looks like I may have some issues at full droop due to the large rocker pivot. That interference will be worse once I have springs installed. Back to the drawing board (or internally limit the shocks, haha).

34c1ec6bc824cdd394e24e8a3b8f2dbb.jpg


04908f9add903bf787263d020d70b145.jpg




58046f5b77c1ae238e78f701c80649f6.jpg
 
Modified rocker seems to work fairly well, but I’m still struggling to get full travel out of the shock. Things are a bit ‘hitchy’ at full droop and the angles get crazy at full compression. I think a massive rocker would solve these issues, but I don’t want to give up the space yet.

Either way, I have a functional prototype using existing parts right now so that’s a win.

233f5003a904332c87dae29ac0d7950d.jpg


44c7f129fdfe8f842605b4e66348a5f4.jpg


59e45220a6b0d2c5616a4e5ed1ab8bf6.jpg
 
Last post then I’ll stop hijacking this thread. I printed some temporary electronics trays and got it running under its own power.

My only gripe with the 1:1 rocker is that the lever arms get pretty short at the limits of travel. So much so that the friction in the pivot prevents it from settling down into ride height unless acted on by an outside force.

I threw some pen springs in the shocks and that did the trick. I prefer to run internal springs anyways, so it’s a win all around. Ride height is dialed and the suspension is controlled. No immediate desire to move away from the stock 100mm shocks.

I’m stoked to get my body and finish this build.

39175e30885bb08c06e8840477d6fcd6.jpg


68fa7e48ff6db84061fd0ba4570af4d9.jpg
 
Hey guys, working on the CODYBOY trx-6. I'm most definitely going to use a cantilever setup. I'm trying to use the shocks I have which are 90mm limited to 80mm. I have a demo set of 1:1 rockers my buddy printed for me. I'm noticing that I might need to go with a 2:1 rocker. I'm thinking the twin hammers rockers are going to be my best bet.

From reading everything here I have a couple questions for you guys. What's your thoughts on running the full size shock? How are things holding up after use? Would you do it differently? Just trying not to do a bunch of trial and error due to low budget and little tinker time available.

Thank you guys for any help and advice!!! Have a great day!!!
 
If you use shorter shocks with stiffer springs and oil, I would imagine you can shorten the top of the triangle and solve some problems.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top