• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Bush Resigns!

Before another ignorant person from a place "Not in the States" has the audacity to imply that I have an issue of Mr. Obama's skin color, you ought to check yourself. Glad you only have a hunch, because you certainly don't have a clue :flipoff:! First and foremost you idiot, my best friend is BLACK, Colored, African-American, or whatever other term you prefer to use you dumb ass! He is a friend of the true meaning, not casual or a person of convenience, but a true friend whom I trust with my children at any and all times, and would trust with my life. Color has nothing to do with anything in my posts.

Referring to Barrack Obama as Mr. Obama is not in disrespect, but of respect of his position and new found title. I didn't refer to him as "The Other Guy", "That One", or any other term previously used. You make comments out of ignorance such as the noted one above and hide in a far away land. Again, as far as how I voted, it wasn't of emotion, religion, or race, it was of experience and personal preference and also, by my CHOICE!

As far as the flag salute is concerned, you again are not understanding a damn thing. So you post a pic of him saluting the flag, that is fine. What I believe however, is that you don't disrespect those who have died for our freedoms by not saluting it. Please understand, he was not "
Making a statement ...I understood this and many others

"He consciously had the guts to show that he is not an ass kisser and a sheep to get to the president position buy doing and acting how everyone wants him to and he didn't really even care because he strongly believes in his dream for a better America!!!".

Here is an excerpt explaining the photo of the "Showing the guts to not be an ass kisser" as you so eloquently put it


salute.jpg



This is from the actual news reporter and Mr. Obama's spokesperson...

Now, what exactly was he doing?? Making a what??? I guess you again are posting out of emotion and lack of facts...Sorry for exposing that...You need to listen to a song by Ted Nugent, it's entitled "Kiss My Ass". You may learn a thing or 2.​

And per the United States Flag Code:

Sec. 4. - Pledge of allegiance to the flag; manner of delivery The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all., should be rendered by standing at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. When not in uniform men should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag, and render the military salute.​

So again, if a "Presidential Candidate" doesn't observe the rules that govern, how can he or she in fact govern themselves?

WOW , you have wasted 30min copying wiki info on the Pledge andrepeating stuff that has already been said 1000 times on this subject...and you are calling me an idiot?

 
No, the National Anthem was not playing during that photo.


Do a simple search on google there nimrod. The Anthom was playing dureing this photo. You will also find a few other things in your google search and the National Anthom and how he refuses the song because it conveys war.

Haven't you been told not to believe everything you read on the internet?

I agree, Nancy Pelosi is an insane bitch and I hope to god nothing ever happens that would allow her to take power of this country.

As for bailouts, McCain voted for the last one too, where's your anger towards him?

The fact of the matter is the Canadian healthcare system is much better than ours and I don't see a problem with not only accepting that but then saying "and we should use it."

Obama is not trying to take your firearms. He might be trying to make it so that it is harder for the criminals to get their hands on guns, but for a normal law-abiding citizen you will still be allowed to purchase firearms.

He has voted yes on every things that has passed in front of him on banning of many of the firearms us outdoors man use. Most of the Semi Auto firearms that are listed in the bans he voted yes on are very common and popular firearms used by outdoorsman such as myself.

The Dems are proposing a 500% increase on tarrif tax on all amunition. That means a box of .22 caliber Long rifle shells will be 500% more expensive then they are now. Oh but then again Google is your friend. Freaking use it.

What fight to take away our freedom to enjoy our public land? Never heard that before...

The Dems are always looking for ways to lock down our public lands to anyone other then people on foot. They have always lobbied hard against any type of motorized recreation. They are already planning a hige land grab that would shut down even more land to the motorized recreationalists. But then I suppose you will agree that nothing with a motor and a set of tires should be allowed on anything but a paved highway. If so then you better sell off your RC crawler.


To the other member

I agree, other then herself. I don't think anyone is advocating that anyone can take her without her permission. Now if you are arguing that she shouldn't be allowed to take herself, then you need to stop living in the 1800's


So you are telling me that if my 16 year old daughter were to become pregnant that she should beable to be escorted to an abortion clinic by someone other then a family member with out my or her mothers knowledge? Come here so I can plant on between your eyes.

How do you feel about partial birth abortions? You know, this is were the baby is partially born and the doctor inserts a needle into the childs brain and kills it before it completely passes through the birth canal.

If so then I will insert a needle into your brain and see how you like it.
 
The fact of the matter is the Canadian healthcare system is much better than ours....
Wrong. Unless you consider forcing sick people to drive for hundreds of miles for their treatments due to the limited locations to be "better" than ours.
 
No, the National Anthem was not playing during that photo.


Do a simple search on google there nimrod. The Anthom was playing dureing this photo. You will also find a few other things in your google search and the National Anthom and how he refuses the song because it conveys war.

Haven't you been told not to believe everything you read on the internet?

I agree, Nancy Pelosi is an insane bitch and I hope to god nothing ever happens that would allow her to take power of this country.

As for bailouts, McCain voted for the last one too, where's your anger towards him?

The fact of the matter is the Canadian healthcare system is much better than ours and I don't see a problem with not only accepting that but then saying "and we should use it."

Obama is not trying to take your firearms. He might be trying to make it so that it is harder for the criminals to get their hands on guns, but for a normal law-abiding citizen you will still be allowed to purchase firearms.

He has voted yes on every things that has passed in front of him on banning of many of the firearms us outdoors man use. Most of the Semi Auto firearms that are listed in the bans he voted yes on are very common and popular firearms used by outdoorsman such as myself.

The Dems are proposing a 500% increase on tarrif tax on all amunition. That means a box of .22 caliber Long rifle shells will be 500% more expensive then they are now. Oh but then again Google is your friend. Freaking use it.

What fight to take away our freedom to enjoy our public land? Never heard that before...

The Dems are always looking for ways to lock down our public lands to anyone other then people on foot. They have always lobbied hard against any type of motorized recreation. They are already planning a hige land grab that would shut down even more land to the motorized recreationalists. But then I suppose you will agree that nothing with a motor and a set of tires should be allowed on anything but a paved highway. If so then you better sell off your RC crawler.


To the other member

I agree, other then herself. I don't think anyone is advocating that anyone can take her without her permission. Now if you are arguing that she shouldn't be allowed to take herself, then you need to stop living in the 1800's


So you are telling me that if my 16 year old daughter were to become pregnant that she should beable to be escorted to an abortion clinic by someone other then a family member with out my or her mothers knowledge? Come here so I can plant on between your eyes.

How do you feel about partial birth abortions? You know, this is were the baby is partially born and the doctor inserts a needle into the childs brain and kills it before it completely passes through the birth canal.

If so then I will insert a needle into your brain and see how you like it.

Let's at least attempt to keep this somewhat civil, shall we? Again I go back to noting that not everything on the internet is fact, which I noticed you didn't touch in your above rant. The last time I checked, everything you find on Google is on the internet. Give me ten minutes and I can find a website that proves John McCain is a reptilean alien from Venus sent here to enslave our rodents - just because I found it doesn't mean it's true.

I'm all for raising the price of amunition, because then you might think before planting one between someones eyes.

I enjoy many forms of outdoor recreation, and I will be right there next to you fighting if anyone starts trying to take all of the areas we use for that recreation.

I disagree with partial birth abortion. In fact I think abortion should illegal after the second trimester, unless there is a question of the woman's health. If it takes you nine months to decide not to have a child, too late.

By the way, the other poster never said she should be able to be escorted to an abortion clinic by someone else. He said she should be able to take herself. I partially agree - I'm sixteen but if I get someone pregnant you're damn right her parents are going to know about it. Of course I will never allow myself to get anyone pregnant, but if a sixteen year old is dumb enough to get pregnant anyway then they need an adult to be able to make an informed decision as to what to do with the pregnancy. That's my opinion.
 
Which post of lies would you like us to read?

Oh never mind because I don't even think you have even looked at what is really going on and you are just going by your personal thoughts.

I've studied both sides of the argument, I've taken abundant college courses on the topic, and I've made my decision based on the facts that I learned. I've answered each one of your posts with intelligent, well formed arguments and you continue to give your words the illusion of depth by including physical threats and demeaning the other members of the forum. I'll continue to answer your posts and in the process continue to prove that it really does take more then name calling to provide a forceful argument.
 
How does raising the price of munitions and making it harder to legally own a gun keep criminals from buying them. I can drive across town right now a buy a few throw aways for less than $100. All you do by making it harder to purchase fire arms is keep them out of the hands of law abiding citizens. Even criminals are smart enough to know not to kill someone with a legal traceable gun.
 
I've studied both sides of the argument, I've taken abundant college courses on the topic, and I've made my decision based on the facts that I learned.
Your opinions will change when your life and family are directly affected by the decisions of the government. I know that mine changed after college when I started experiencing the government and its interactions with the people of this country.
 
Read several of your post.

Please point out were any of these were addressed.

Alright, here we go. First, why do you continue to call a raise in taxes a redistribution of wealth? We've had taxes for a long ass time, and yet this is the first time I've heard a raising of those already established taxes as "socialism". Unless you can come up with some facts that show that Obama literally plans to throw all of your posessions into one communal pot, then I'm done with the socialist argument.

I have no problems with gun control laws. If you look at the last eight years many tragedies could have been avoided if there were stricter gun laws put into place, such as the numerous school shootings. I don't know about you, but if my child was killed by some emo kid with a rifle it would make it damn hard to pick up a gun for the rest of my life. If I have to spend a few more bucks or wait a few more days to pick up a gun from the store to keep guns out of the hands of unstable people, so be it.

Bill Ayers was a man who made a very stupid decision - when Barack Obama was eight. He payed for his mistakes, and by the time Obama had "associated" with him, he had not only moved on from his wrong doings but had been awarded the Chicago "Citizen of the Year" Award for his work in education.

I'm not going to dignify the last example with a response.
 
Your opinions will change when your life and family are directly affected by the decisions of the government. I know that mine changed after college when I started experiencing the government and its interactions with the people of this country.

My opinions will not change.
 
My opinions will not change.
I dont mean to sound like a parent, but you really need to EXPERIENCE the government....not just read about it.

Rudukai13 said:
Unless you can come up with some facts that show that Obama literally plans to throw all of your posessions into one communal pot, then I'm done with the socialist argument.
How about his views on taking my 401K (yes, the money that I have earned and that my employer has matched and that we have BOTH paid taxes on) and telling me that I do not know what should be done with it? That sure as hell sounds like a socialist policy to me!

My above statement is not something that you can or will read about in a text book...it is also something that I did NOT care about when in school, but NOW it affects my life and my family in a SEVERE manner. If this policy is enacted, I will NOT be able to retire and survive (I am not counting on the money that I pay into Social Security to be available to me when that time comes).
 
Last edited:
I'm a happily married woman, but, Jason, I really love you right now.

The crap being spouted on here by the lefties is some scary shite.

In a few years, you're gonna feel like da's. That is if you're man enough to admit the mistake of voting this guy in. And I have ZERO respect for someone who is going make life harder for me and mine. Pull your heads out of your arseholes. No one is labeling his policies laid out as socialism for no reason. If you don't think his agenda is socialist, then you need to do more research. All of the taxes and policies he wants to push are nothing but.

Peace out
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, which I very well may be, but isn't the fear of a dissapearing Social Security fund due to having funds stolen to help pay for the war in Iraq? And where does it say that you won't be in control of your 401k?
 
No, disappearing SS funds is based on the premise of how the system was put in place when it was first started (as part of the New Deal from FDR). People were not given retirement funds based on what they contributed, rather what their grandchildren contributed.

I have seen multiple news articles that stated that the Democrats were entertaining the fact of government controlled 401Ks....all to save tax money. I am not saying that this is an idea of the President Elect, but that his party is "entertaining" this idea.
 
Last edited:
I'm all for raising the price of amunition, because then you might think before planting one between someones eyes

hmm...If I'm annoyed enough to "plant one between someones eyes" I'm not really worried about how much the ammunition cost me...and just as a example the douchebag that shot my cousin 4 times for $10 was a homeless guy. making ammunition costlier or making gun laws tighter wouldn't have stopped that but..if the gun laws were made for "law abiding" citizens he might have been able to buy a gun to defend himself and not be denied because he got a dui 10 years earlier....
 
No, disappearing SS funds is based on the premise of how the system was put in place when it was first started (as part of the New Deal from FDR). People were not given retirement funds based on what they contributed, rather what their grandchildren contributed.

I have seen multiple news articles that stated that the Democrats were entertaining the fact of government controlled 401Ks....all to save tax money. I am not saying that this is an idea of the President Elect, but that his party is "entertaining" this idea.

Ok, sorry. I was confused by your above post where you say "How about his views on taking..." By "him" that would suggest you were referring to Obama, not the party.

Oh, and the last time I checked, a DUI isn't "law abiding"
 
Ok, sorry. I was confused by your above post where you say "How about his views on taking..." By "him" that would suggest you were referring to Obama, not the party.
:roll:
Last time I checked, a politician doesn't get elected or re-elected if he goes against "his" party.
 
Back
Top