Hardline
Rock Crawler
Judging is a significant problem in the sport. Judges are just people, some are picky and hard-nosed, others are easy going and don't want to upset. One would think that if the same person judged a course all day, it would be uniform, thus fair, regardless of his approach. But I've never seen a single judge work the entire field at a major. Chances are, he's a competitor too, and needs to be spelled for his own runs. Or he needs a lunch or bathroom break. Or they alternate two judges to get people through faster. Judging is subjective when it comes to flying over gates (float?), legal roll-overs, how close to a marker is too close.
It's even worse at regional events where everybody takes a stint at judging because few individuals are willing to judge all day. Again, I don't know how to fix the problem, but rewriting rules to eliminate some of the required subjective calls would help. IE the roll-over rule we've been discussing and banning over-flights. Between the markers means BETWEEN the markers....not 2 feet above them. I've seen terrible calls on this on a pretty regular basis. Many not getting called on floats where others were.
It's even worse at regional events where everybody takes a stint at judging because few individuals are willing to judge all day. Again, I don't know how to fix the problem, but rewriting rules to eliminate some of the required subjective calls would help. IE the roll-over rule we've been discussing and banning over-flights. Between the markers means BETWEEN the markers....not 2 feet above them. I've seen terrible calls on this on a pretty regular basis. Many not getting called on floats where others were.