Thanks RG!
As much as I love the new tires, I feel like they're one of the primary drawbacks running on soft terrain. They simply don't have the necessary "bite" to propel the rig forward. Even on a minimally steep grade, the tires are breaking loose and spinning. Of course that immediately causes the rig to sink down... further sealing it's fate as "stuck". This negative attribute seems only made worse due to all the weight that I've added to the skid-plates in conjunction with the heavier wheels. I believe that reducing weight and running tires with a more aggressive tread pattern is the solution... or at the very least, a step in the right direction.
Conversely, I believe that these new tires and wheels are very beneficial on harder surfaces like the hard-packed clay and downed trees simply due to that softer compound and additional weight. It seems that this little rig really can crawl well but it desperately needs the right tires and ideal weight to accomplish this.
As much as the torque-twist is still evident ( since I haven't done anything yet to the shock travel/ compression), I don't feel that it hindered the rig much... at least not in the conditions that I was running her in yesterday. Imho lower gearing is not going to hurt this rig at all but again, in soft dirt, I don't think that the gearing is going to be as beneficial as reducing weight and choosing the right tires. Another note... Having some weight up front doesn't seem to be as much of a hindrance as having too much weight in the rear. To add to this theory, it seems that ( again... on loose/ soft terrain) there may be a distinct difference between static weight ( on the chassis) and rotational weight ( on the wheels). I'm not sure of this but it seems that the rotational weight on the rear-end of this rig is most assuredly it's downfall in loose conditions.
We're going to go back out to that same spot today and I will have the more aggressive stock tires and lighter-weight plastic wheels back on so that I may determine if my suspicions are confirmed.
As much as I love the new tires, I feel like they're one of the primary drawbacks running on soft terrain. They simply don't have the necessary "bite" to propel the rig forward. Even on a minimally steep grade, the tires are breaking loose and spinning. Of course that immediately causes the rig to sink down... further sealing it's fate as "stuck". This negative attribute seems only made worse due to all the weight that I've added to the skid-plates in conjunction with the heavier wheels. I believe that reducing weight and running tires with a more aggressive tread pattern is the solution... or at the very least, a step in the right direction.
Conversely, I believe that these new tires and wheels are very beneficial on harder surfaces like the hard-packed clay and downed trees simply due to that softer compound and additional weight. It seems that this little rig really can crawl well but it desperately needs the right tires and ideal weight to accomplish this.
As much as the torque-twist is still evident ( since I haven't done anything yet to the shock travel/ compression), I don't feel that it hindered the rig much... at least not in the conditions that I was running her in yesterday. Imho lower gearing is not going to hurt this rig at all but again, in soft dirt, I don't think that the gearing is going to be as beneficial as reducing weight and choosing the right tires. Another note... Having some weight up front doesn't seem to be as much of a hindrance as having too much weight in the rear. To add to this theory, it seems that ( again... on loose/ soft terrain) there may be a distinct difference between static weight ( on the chassis) and rotational weight ( on the wheels). I'm not sure of this but it seems that the rotational weight on the rear-end of this rig is most assuredly it's downfall in loose conditions.
We're going to go back out to that same spot today and I will have the more aggressive stock tires and lighter-weight plastic wheels back on so that I may determine if my suspicions are confirmed.
Last edited: