In the past I used 35 weight all around. I'm now trying 35wt up front and 70wt in the rear. The theory is that the rear shocks will compress less when doing uphills and also more resistant to flexing and allowing the truck to rollover when sidehilling. I have not had a chance to drive this setup yet though.
vary littleThis makes sense to me. How much of a factor does the weight of the truck play into this?
Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
This makes sense to me. How much of a factor does the weight of the truck play into this?
Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
It's a personal preference. Do you like your suspension to be more active (softer) or more resistant to rolling (stiffer)?
In the past I used 35 weight all around. I'm now trying 35wt up front and 70wt in the rear. The theory is that the rear shocks will compress less when doing uphills and also more resistant to flexing and allowing the truck to rollover when sidehilling. I have not had a chance to drive this setup yet though.
To throw another kink in the discussion....
I don't use oil in my shocks, mostly. Plastic bodied Axial shocks....All oil leacks out. Axial Icon's... I really don't know, there might be oil in them still. Traxxas big bores... 30wt Axial oil. Rc4wd superlift friction Shocks.... 3n1 machine oil for lubrication.
I find, that I like the way the truck moves with very little dampening, plus it looks realistic while bouncing down the trail. Another guy I know loves his heavy oils and massive dampening 75 wt+...
It turns out its all about how you drive your rig, and how you wnt it to react. Firmer dampening or none at all, are the extremes.