• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

California is...........

The Violator

RCC Addict
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
1,836
Location
Token's life matters
SCREWED

From Fox news

Gender spenders: San Francisco to foot bill for sex changes


In the midst of cash-strapped Californians approving new taxes to prevent further cuts in essential state services, San Francisco health officials appear to have found the money to fund what they say is a much-needed service to residents living in the City by the Bay:

Sex changes.

The gender-switching surgeries are part of a comprehensive program for treating transgender people that the city's Health Commission green-lighted on Tuesday and announced two days later. Backers say it will help ease the mental anguish of people who feel they are trapped in bodies of the wrong gender, but critics wonder why the taxpayers should foot the bill.

“Taxpayers cannot afford this, as there are unintended costs and unintended consequences unrelated to the actual surgery, such as their longer-term hormone treatment, psychology needs and other longer term health issues,” said Thomas Moyer, a City by the Bay resident and author of “A Conservative Survival Guide to San Francisco.”

“Taxpayers cannot afford this.”

- Thomas Moyer, a City by the Bay resident and author of “A Conservative Survival Guide to San Francisco.”


Under Mayor Ed Lee, the city's current budget topped $7 billion for the first time in history this year. In addition to the local tax burden, residents have seen their cash-strapped state slash an array of services.

The idea of taxpayer-funded sex change operations came out of talks between public health officials and transgender rights advocates who wanted mastectomies, genital reconstructions and other surgeries covered under San Francisco's universal health care program. City

Public Health Director Barbara Garcia said the program could be in operation late next year, once her department has studied how many people it would serve, how much it would cost and who would perform the surgeries.

Transgender advocates hailed the vote.

“All Americans, in consultation with their doctors, should be able to receive the medical care they need to live healthy lives,” said Kristina Wertz, program director for the San Francisco-based Transgender Law Center. “That’s why we applaud San Francisco’s decision to allow transgender people the ability to receive the medical care they need to be healthy.”

But Moyer said people should pay for their own sex changes, and public money would be better spent elsewhere.

“This surgery is not an essential health function, especially when it would be taking money away from those suffering from chronic illnesses like cancer, Aids, and heart disease,” Moyer said. “We are already stretched too thin as San Francisco is facing a budget deficit and won't be able to afford the costs of this
 
Violator, what they forgot to say in that article is that the state will gladly pay for the surgeries........but the governor's mansion gardener will be performing the surgeries with his work tools. :lol:
 
Better not use any of my money for that. People here are basically ridiculous around here, I didnt see that on the ballot so this is just a decision they are making...Against our wishes!

Its funny, in this election for the most part the state voted very conservative by voting against increased taxes and spending yet it was a landslide for ever democrat on the ballot...Not sure if these people know anything about the two parties or what they believe in.

To sum it all up
images

Baaaaaaaa!
 
Gavin Newsome started the "Healthy San Francisco" program back in '09. There are alot of things not put on ballots that city gov't officials pass along.. like my fav, the fawkin ban on plastic bags in San Jose. Not to go too far off topic, but I have city acknowledgement in email form about profits being made by the city because of the ordinance.

The "Healthy San Francisco" program is part of the city and not the state.
 
I have a sharp knife and an industrial stapler!!!!! Just like Robin hood,,, I'll take from one and give to the other.:mrgreen:

$199.00 couples special.
 
so where is the actual news part of that opinion piece?

Amen! This story is total bullshit.
I live in the SF bay area. Do you think we would not have fought this tooth and nail if it were real? Seriously. Look at the source of the shit you read.
:banghead:


Also, Gavin Blewsom is the biggest ass hat this state may ever see. And as evidenced last Tuesday, this country seems to love some asshattery. :what:
 
Last edited:
Amen! This story is total bullshit.
I live in the SF bay area. Do you think we would not have fought this tooth and nail if it were real? Seriously. Look at the source of the shit you read.
:banghead:


Also, Gavin Blewsom is the biggest ass hat this state may ever see. And as evidenced last Tuesday, this country seems to love some asshattery. :what:
Haha...you said ass hat.:mrgreen:
 
Beautiful state with lots of good people but the political arena is FAWKED due to the big city libtards. We have the same issue up here in WA, king, snohomish and pierce counties run the state so we that live on the other side of the mountains have no say.
 
Words can not express how glad i am i dont live there anymore.... that is the stupidest shit i have ever heard......
i have now problem with people who want the surgery but Seriously WHY the F@%K should tax payers have to pay for it??????????????????
how does that make any damn since even to a LIBTARD....
 
Back
Top