IntrepidMercians
Rock Stacker
Hi,
I use the Bomber for what I guess you guys call "bashing" - scooting around the local scenery at a bit faster than walking pace looking for places to crawl.
Sadly we aren't blessed locally with epic rock outcrops or vast forests. :-(
After a fair few excursions I tried the ring and pinion reversal modification to reduce torque twist on steep climbs. The Bomber would have plenty of grip but would try and pull a corkscrew on such a climb. The reversal worked fairly well but eventually I found a sway bar cheap on the auction site, bought it and bolted it on.
The sway bar is the Axial AX31331 RR10 Rear Sway Bar Set described as "Soft". Crikey - if that is soft I'd hate to try an Axial marshmallow!
I need to measure the wire and do some sums to work out the rate of this part, suffice to say that even with the longer bar ends I find it limits rear articulation too much. Cornering is great but now it seems more prone to roll over on off-camber situations. I think this is because in the past the downhill wheel would force compression and keep the C of G low. Now the increased roll stiffness prevents this and presto! the Bomber is on it's roof and the dudes inside have headaches. :-(
A bit of background now before my next idea:
I have been off-roading Land Rover products for years and spent a lot of time tinkering with spring rates on coil-sprung vehicles to get the axle articulation to be as close to 50:50 as possible (results in the vehicle remaning nominally zero pitch/roll in cross-axle situations which is great for driver confidence and vehicle ability).
The coil sprung 'Rover suspension is hampered off-road by the front radius arm / panhard rod setup. I know this is a world away from 4-link front/rear but there are some commonalities.
It is very easy to get lots of travel out of the 'Rover 3-link rear, not so the front. I ended up running rear springs which are quite a bit stiffer than the front which results in the front being forced to comply (against the nature of it's geometry) and thus give a well-mannered twisty truck. In this case spring rates were 133 lb/in front and about 175/200 lb/in rear on a truck of 3000 lb kerb.
I think that the Bomber needs the same trick so I spent a little while tabulating the 14 x 90 and 14 x 70 spring options to see what might be worth trying, there are a few.
I need to sort out the sway bar rate as a benchmark but I think moving to a slightly stiffer rear spring and eliminating the limiting factor of the sway bar may result in a better behaved Bomber when scooting or crawling.
I use the Bomber for what I guess you guys call "bashing" - scooting around the local scenery at a bit faster than walking pace looking for places to crawl.
Sadly we aren't blessed locally with epic rock outcrops or vast forests. :-(
After a fair few excursions I tried the ring and pinion reversal modification to reduce torque twist on steep climbs. The Bomber would have plenty of grip but would try and pull a corkscrew on such a climb. The reversal worked fairly well but eventually I found a sway bar cheap on the auction site, bought it and bolted it on.
The sway bar is the Axial AX31331 RR10 Rear Sway Bar Set described as "Soft". Crikey - if that is soft I'd hate to try an Axial marshmallow!
I need to measure the wire and do some sums to work out the rate of this part, suffice to say that even with the longer bar ends I find it limits rear articulation too much. Cornering is great but now it seems more prone to roll over on off-camber situations. I think this is because in the past the downhill wheel would force compression and keep the C of G low. Now the increased roll stiffness prevents this and presto! the Bomber is on it's roof and the dudes inside have headaches. :-(
A bit of background now before my next idea:
I have been off-roading Land Rover products for years and spent a lot of time tinkering with spring rates on coil-sprung vehicles to get the axle articulation to be as close to 50:50 as possible (results in the vehicle remaning nominally zero pitch/roll in cross-axle situations which is great for driver confidence and vehicle ability).
The coil sprung 'Rover suspension is hampered off-road by the front radius arm / panhard rod setup. I know this is a world away from 4-link front/rear but there are some commonalities.
It is very easy to get lots of travel out of the 'Rover 3-link rear, not so the front. I ended up running rear springs which are quite a bit stiffer than the front which results in the front being forced to comply (against the nature of it's geometry) and thus give a well-mannered twisty truck. In this case spring rates were 133 lb/in front and about 175/200 lb/in rear on a truck of 3000 lb kerb.
I think that the Bomber needs the same trick so I spent a little while tabulating the 14 x 90 and 14 x 70 spring options to see what might be worth trying, there are a few.
I need to sort out the sway bar rate as a benchmark but I think moving to a slightly stiffer rear spring and eliminating the limiting factor of the sway bar may result in a better behaved Bomber when scooting or crawling.