• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Ackerman Steering with Locked Diffs

DKNguyen

Quarry Creeper
Joined
Jan 29, 2007
Messages
308
Location
Alberta, Canada
Hi everybody. I was wondering if someone who knew more about car steering could help me answer this question. When turning corners on pavement you need both ackerman steering (to compensate for the different geometries of the two steering wheels) and an open differential (to compensate for the differences in speed). If you don't have these then the wheels skid when you turn.

What if you had a steering servo for each steerable wheel (rather than ganged) and a computer to control both to get ackerman steering. Would it be pointless if you didn't have an open differential since the wheels would still skid due to the speed difference? Except that now they have no more side-skid (they only skid along the steering circle rather)? I think it might improve control (and maybe reduce axle stress) but I'm not sure. I know the ackerman is pointless when you're on rocks but I'm talking about pavement.

THanks!
 
Last edited:
The ackerman effect happens when caster is added to the front axle.

What this causes is the inside rear tire to lift while the vehicle is turning. It is a very simple.

There are two things to increase rear wheel lift:
-Add more caster. But this also increases the amount of camber that is gained while turning the wheels.
-Space the front tires further out on the spindles.

I would research the effects of Caster and the ackerman effet by reading through some Kart articles. My Swiss Hutless would lift the inside tire about 3"~4" without someone in it.

Edit: http://www.sniper.com.au/kartoztech2.htm
 
Last edited:
Behind the Axle (BTA) is the best way to correct the Ackerman on a Clod. This actually gives you too much but it's better than the stock setup with the steering arms out front.
Leave the tie rod behind the axle on the rear axle.

Ben, I really wouldn't expect to see any weight jacking or weight transfer in a slow speed crawler.
 
That's a neat product. I still might try and go with double servos though just due to wanting to stick some antenna on the knuckle steering mounts as well and with double servos you get independent antenna that can face in different directions.
 
Behind the Axle (BTA) is the best way to correct the Ackerman on a Clod. This actually gives you too much but it's better than the stock setup with the steering arms out front.
Leave the tie rod behind the axle on the rear axle.

With the steering arms in front of the axles you get the outer wheel to turn with smaller turning radius then the inner wheel which is the opposite of Ackerman steering - not good.
 
With Ackerman and open diff - best for pavement only

With Ackerman and lock diff - best for rock crawling but still perform well on pavement in term of steering control since there is no side-skidding

Without Ackerman (parallel steering arm) - acceptable steering performance on rock (with locked diff) and pavement (with open diff).

With negative Ackerman (stock setup) - worst steering performance for rock and pavement . It may help a little bit if you have open diff but you cannot overcome most of the obstacles. There will be a lot of stress on your steering servo, axle tube and axle C etc. IMHO
 
Back
Top