• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Axial 55' F100 Wroncho

xtreme4x2

Quarry Creeper
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
283
Location
WA state
Not sure who might be interested, but I decided to build a wroncho out of the Axial 1955 Ford F100. Planning on making it a mud truck. Feel free to ask any questions.

This is my second SCX10-ii Wroncho build, they're pretty fun so hopefully someone finds this useful to build their own "thumbsup"

Brand new Axial Ford F100 bought from RPP for $299 on Black Friday
oAJv2Bvm.jpg

ImSmzZom.jpg



Needed parts:
1. Wraith Links with EXTENDED rear links. (The Incision links pictured won't work since they don't have extended rear links). I've used RC issues. they have brass and aluminum options.

2. Vanquish wraith panhard kit - VP.S03250 I was able to use some links from the incision kit for the steering links.

3. Scaler Fab universal bracket. I use scx10 ii trans skids. Both Vader products and stock work with this bracket.

4. Shocks - I got 100mm shocks from a member on here, but ended up using amazon 120mm internal spring shocks for now. My wroncho
Cherokee uses 110mm Amazon shocks and works great.

5. Tires - I'm using RC4WD 2.2 TSL Super Swampers 5.7in!!

6. Wheels - Amazon 2.2 beadlocks. Have a great offset. I'm going to pair them with SSD scale brake rotors for even more offset.

I also FINALLY got MIP tools 8)

YkCi23Vm.jpg

T2dn9zsm.jpg

HQYMf9qm.jpg

w471HF5m.jpg

mKtNnb1m.jpg
 
Used a dremel so the brackets fit between the slider mounts

Non=Receiver side
5wiBPz1l.jpg


Receiver side
Yzvolwjl.jpg


Rear link/shock mounts
h91Wro5m.jpg

8H3DNWLm.jpg


I'm still waiting for the extended rear link, but its mounted for now
ucO212Cm.jpg

yOylT2jm.jpg

Azz8Fkdm.jpg


Front CMS kit and links on
9m4jPIzl.jpg

HWNXhzcl.jpg


Still more progress coming, here it is so far next to a stock height and my 2.2 wroncho for comparison.

rkn0hjQl.jpg
 
Thanks man! The links get here Monday, so it should be finished then. I'll be posting more detailed photos on everything too. I'll be looking to add fender liners and an interior "thumbsup"
 
What is the benefit of extending the wheelbase with the extended rear links?

Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk

It centers the wheel in the wheel well. With out it the wheels are about an inch too far forward. If you have a truggy you don't need it, but if have a body you will.
 
Its 97% complete.

ScalerFab brackets mounted
X2AQ79xl.jpg


I used a shorter link and bent it to clear the crossmember by the receiver box.
A5tAstLl.jpg


Nut and bolt for that link go into the reciever box and the hole was filled with liquid electrical tape.
bZkTiDZl.jpg


Extended RC Issues links
Top
sINQYGRl.jpg

Bottom
vngW2lrl.jpg


Used extended driveshafts for the rear
sjptT7zl.jpg


Finished! Just needs front fender liners, interior and a brushless system 8)
LUies5Pl.jpg

DJWDDk9l.jpg

wxanRvMl.jpg

UbFkRsnl.jpg

6ZnTmyrl.jpg

FjeZ0Grl.jpg
 
My Cherokee Wroncho wheelbase is 13 1/4. Possibly due to the height difference.
0eb1bb0cb61629766dcf0aa71f92fd11.jpg


ccb0727bb97914d61df1c8be59420e3d.jpg

758f3636a74e8ac2b9f8fda887845388.jpg


Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Nice builds!
I dig the XJ too.
How do the tires compare with each other?

Thanks man! I'd pick the Swampers over the boggers any day. For the ford I went with the boggers due to size as I plan on using it more as a faster mud/sand truck. They both have proline dual stage foams. The side walls on the boggers seems thin. A lot of reviews mention this as well.

The XJ crawls great and swampers in 1.9 or 2.2 are some of the best tires you can run IMO.

I also have the same boggers and swampers in 1.9s and the swampers are better. Both have proline dual stage foams, but this time the boggers are on the axial 8 holes and swampers are on SSD wheels haha

If you go with swampers in 1.9 I recommend SSD wheels with the brass rings, and Proline dual stage foams. "thumbsup"
 
Last edited:
Thanks man! I'd pick the Swampers over the boggers any day. For the ford I went with the boggers due to size as I plan on using it more as a faster mud/sand truck. They both have proline dual stage foams. The side walls on the boggers seems thin. A lot of reviews mention this as well.

The XJ crawls great and swampers in 1.9 or 2.2 are some of the best tires you can run IMO.

I also have the same boggers and swampers in 1.9s and the swampers are better. Both have proline dual stage foams, but this time the boggers are on the axial 8 holes and swampers are on SSD wheels haha

If you go with swampers in 1.9 I recommend SSD wheels with the brass rings, and Proline dual stage foams. "thumbsup"
Thanks. I’ve just recently picked up a set of Duratrax Deep Woods and they work really well but for the next one I want something different only so that everything is not the same,. I was looking at those two options so the question was timely.
Swampers it is. "thumbsup"
 
Back
Top